Environment & Safety
Safety
We manage the safety of our workers through programs, systems, and standards, with our Safety, Health, Environment and Quality (SHEQ) Policy providing overarching guidance. There are many aspects of the management system that contribute to a safe work environment, a few examples include:
- Risk assessments help identify issues and determine the appropriate controls; the corrective action process verifies that incidents and near misses are reported, tracked, investigated and shared with colleagues; and emergency preparedness and planning prepare us to respond to serious incidents.
- We have developed 12 corporate safety standards to help protect our workers from our most common hazards. Some standards guide our general safety practices, such as our job hazard analysis and our job task observation, and other standards deal with specific hazardous situations (similar to other companies’ life saving rules): such as fall protection, confined space entry, rigging and hoisting, and control of hazardous energy (also referred to as lockout/tagout).
- Routine audits are conducted to monitor compliance with regulations and our own requirements. These and other aspects of the management system are routinely examined to verify that they continue to be effective at keeping our workers safe.
Radiation Protection
Radiation risks are effectively managed at McArthur River and Key Lake. Each operation has a formal radiation protection program and dedicated personnel who ensure that doses to workers are as low as reasonably achievable. The programs require that radiation protection is considered in the physical design of all facilities and operating procedures. They also provide for systematic monitoring of radiation in work areas and track exposures of individual workers using a combination of monitoring devices and health testing. Radiation exposures at McArthur River and Key Lake are far below below the regulated limits.
Environmental Protection
At Cameco, protection of the environment is one of our highest corporate priorities during all stages of our activities, from exploration through development, operations, decommissioning, and reclamation.
We monitor our performance by tracking corporate and site-specific key performance indicators, conducting environmental monitoring programs, and regularly auditing our adherence to the requirements of these programs We use the information from all of our programs to help us to identify opportunities to improve.
Environmental management system
We have a ISO 14001-certified environmental management system used across our operating sites, which is supported by a corporate Environmental Management Program that outlines the operating requirements sites must meet. Our environmental management system encourages and promotes continuous adaptation of our practices based on new information and technologies.
Environmental risk assessments
We complete environmental risk assessments to systematically identify, quantify, and to characterize the potential risks to the environment, workers, and the public. We use our environmental risk assessments to inform our decisions and actions. Additionally, we complete an iterative process, where required, to verify that our proposed measures to protect the environment and the public are effective. We review or update the assessments every five years, incorporating results from our environmental monitoring programs and other scientific advances.
Environmental performance reports
For our Saskatchewan operations, every five years we also compare monitoring data collected during the reporting period against predictions contained in approved environmental risk assessments or environmental assessments. By reviewing the data from the performance reports and conducting risks assessments, we are able to demonstrate that human health and the environment in the vicinity of our Saskatchewan operations remains protected. Results from these analyses are also used to inform changes to the environmental monitoring programs conducted at each operation.
Corrective action process
We have a corrective action process in place to systematically investigate and address the causes of non-conformance to regulatory requirements or internal standards. The process includes classifying the non-conformance, assigning the appropriate level of investigation (dependent on incident significance), and tracking the recommended corrective actions to prevent and mitigate similar occurrences.
Audits
To support our culture of continuous improvement, our processes and operations undergo regular audits, including:
- Our environmental management system is audited by a third-party every three years as a requirement to maintain our ISO 14001 certification.
- Our SHEQ team conducts an internal audit of our SHEQ programs on a three-year cycle. The total audit scope is split in half and executed on a rotating basis. This means that all our sites undergo at least two audits to cover all aspects of our SHEQ programs within every three-year period. The audit follows the ISO 19001 process and encompasses our environmental and safety programs.
- We also maintain and implement an internal audit program at our corporate office. Results and recommendations from this systematic and documented process are presented to senior management, who are responsible for implementing them and correcting any deficiencies. The internal audit group reports to the audit and finance committee of the board.
Environmental Monitoring
Comprehensive monitoring programs are in place at the McArthur River and Key Lake operations to help ensure that the surrounding environment is protected. Samples of water, air, soil, plants and fish are collected from numerous locations around the sites and tested to confirm that environmental protection systems are effective. Monitoring results are submitted to federal and provincial regulatory authorities for review. Cameco also supports independent regional monitoring downstream of its Saskatchewan operations to ensure there are no cumulative effects on the regional watershed. The extensive monitoring undertaken at McArthur River and Key Lake has identified no significant impact on the surrounding environment.
Environmental Incidents and Other Events
Environmental incidents and other events are reported to regulatory agencies as required by federal and provincial regulations.
Latest incidents or events:
McArthur River
Date | April 7, 2024 |
Incident |
Emergency transport to external medical facilities |
Details |
The emergency response team (ERT) was activated to respond to a non-occupational medical emergency for an underground worker. The worker was taken to the health centre for assessment and treatment. While the ERT was activated, the team assisted a second worker who received an injury to their face while observing a coworker operating a handheld hammer drill. |
Corrective Action |
The ERT helped both workers report to the on-site health centre. Both workers were sent off-site by air ambulance for additional medical assessment. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
McArthur River
Date | April 7, 2024 |
Incident |
Emergency transport to external medical facilities |
Details |
The emergency response team (ERT) was activated to respond to a non-occupational medical emergency for an underground worker. The worker was taken to the health centre for assessment and treatment. While the ERT was activated, the team assisted a second worker who received an injury to their face while observing a coworker operating a handheld hammer drill. |
Corrective Action |
The ERT helped both workers report to the on-site health centre. Both workers were sent off-site by air ambulance for additional medical assessment. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | March 7, 2024 |
Incident |
Radiation Action Level Exceedance |
Details |
Regular monitoring determined the dose for two workers had exceeded the weekly action level. The quarterly dose estimate for one of the workers also exceeds the quarterly action level. The annual dose estimates for both workers are well below the regulatory limit. |
Corrective Action |
Preliminary investigation suggests that the exposure may be linked to completing multiple manual measurements of the elevation of the concrete while backfilling a production raise underground. The site is investigating the procedure for this task to ensure it is being performed consistent with the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | December 11-12, 2023 |
Incident |
Dangerous Occurrence / Lost-Time Injury |
Details |
On December 11, 2023, a worker was operating a scoop by remote control from a crosscut in a waste pass on the 640L. There was a run of muck when material hung up in the waste pass released, which pressed up onto and moved the scoop. The worker turned to further retreat into the crosscut, tripped and banged their knee. The worker was provided first aid on December 12 and returned to full duties for the remainder of their shift. The worker later provided a sick note stating they were unable to return to work on their next scheduled shift. Cameco learned that the absence may be due to an off-site diagnosis of a psychological injury related to the workplace event involving the worker on December 11, 2023. The injury is being classified as a lost-time injury. The event involving the run of muck has been deemed a dangerous occurrence. |
Corrective Action |
Both the nursing team and the disability management team have been engaged in this event to ensure proper care is available for the worker. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | July 10, 2023 |
Incident |
Event Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer |
Details |
During the annual field verification of all radioactive sources, site radiation staff were unable to locate one americium 241 check source that is included in the source inventory list. The source activity is below the exemption quantity. After reporting to the supervisor, a secondary search of the sealed source storage area was completed. |
Corrective Action |
The site is investigating whether the source was previously disposed or transferred and not removed from the inventory list. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Date | June 22, 2023 |
Incident |
Reportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release |
Details |
Approximately 150 litres of contaminated liquid from the mine water treatment process were released to the ground adjacent to the Mine Water Treatment Plant. The amount released was confirmed to be well below the discharge quantity of 1000 L and was due to a leak in the filter system used to separate the solids from the mine water. |
Corrective Action |
The affected area was cleaned and the contaminated material was placed on a mineralized ore storage pad. A radiation scan of the area confirmed the release was fully cleaned. The maintenance department repaired the filter system and curtains were installed around the perimeter of the filter system. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Cameco Environmental Effect Rating
- Level 1 - no measurable impact to the environment
- Level 2 - negligible impact
- Level 3 - short-term, seasonal impact
- Level 4 - mortality of some species, but not affecting ecosystem function
- Level 5 - impairment of ecosystem function
- N/A - not applicable
Key Lake
Date | March 12, 2024 |
Incident |
Reportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release |
Details |
Following routine review, the Industrial Water Reservoir level was found to be decreasing below the normal operating level. Upon investigation, the industrial water pipeline located underground was determined to be leaking and the industrial water (treated effluent) was found at the surface approximately 85 meters south of the Ore Receiving building. The pipeline, which supplies the industrial and fire protection water, needed to be shutdown, resulting in production being temporarily halted. The amount of industrial treated water released is above the reporting threshold of 100,000 L. |
Corrective Action |
The incident was reported to the CNSC and Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment. Excavation of the area identified a failed coupling, which has been repaired. Hot work on site had been prohibited and fire watch rounds were implemented until the fire protection systems were fully restored. Production resumed on the morning of March 14, 2024. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Key Lake
Date | March 12, 2024 |
Incident |
Reportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release |
Details |
Following routine review, the Industrial Water Reservoir level was found to be decreasing below the normal operating level. Upon investigation, the industrial water pipeline located underground was determined to be leaking and the industrial water (treated effluent) was found at the surface approximately 85 meters south of the Ore Receiving building. The pipeline, which supplies the industrial and fire protection water, needed to be shutdown, resulting in production being temporarily halted. The amount of industrial treated water released is above the reporting threshold of 100,000 L. |
Corrective Action |
The incident was reported to the CNSC and Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment. Excavation of the area identified a failed coupling, which has been repaired. Hot work on site had been prohibited and fire watch rounds were implemented until the fire protection systems were fully restored. Production resumed on the morning of March 14, 2024. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Date | February 27, 2024 |
Incident |
Lost-Time Incident |
Details |
While drilling a hole, a worker caught their glove in the spade bit, resulting in a cut to their finger. The worker was assessed at the site Health Center and the injury was initially classified as a restricted work event. A secondary assessment by an offsite medical professional determined the worker was unable to return to work. This was reclassified as a lost-time injury on March 14, 2024. |
Corrective Action |
A lack of hazard recognition and improper tool use was determined to be the cause. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | January 20, 2024 |
Incident |
Radiation Action Level Exceedance |
Details |
While building scaffold in the horizontal calciner, two workers were exposed to calcined yellowcake material resulting in dose estimates above the weekly action level of 1mSv. The workers had worn their coveralls into a lunchroom trailer. Investigation determined the trailer had detectable levels of contamination, requiring it to be thoroughly washed and re-tested to verify cleanliness. |
Corrective Action |
Following a review, both workers were placed on enhanced monitoring and an investigation commenced. The work procedure was revised for this area which includes a decontamination process. The event has been reported to the CNSC. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | November 27, 2023 |
Incident |
Reportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release |
Details |
When testing the industrial water booster pump after maintenance, approximately 3,750 L of industrial water was released from a hose near Pond 5. The operator accidently opened a valve to a hose connected to the line. The operator closed the valve and reported the event to the Environment Department. |
Corrective Action |
A sample was collected from the line and the area was inspected for erosion. The event has been reported to the CNSC. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Date | November 13, 2023 |
Incident |
Lost-time injury |
Details |
A worker attempted to open the hood from the side of the slurry power unit and felt a muscle strain in their back. The worker did not report the injury immediately as required and finished their shift. The worker then reported the injury to their supervisor and was assessed at the Health Center. The injury was initially classified as a restricted work event but was reclassified as a lost-time injury on December 7. |
Corrective Action |
The worker did not follow instruction by lifting the slurry power unit hood from the wrong location, not requesting help to lift hood, and not reporting injury immediately. Further investigation to be completed. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | November 11, 2023 |
Incident |
Lost-time injury |
Details |
While a worker was loosening a steel pipe with a pipe wrench in the Acid Plant, the worker felt a strain in the inner elbow. The worker immediately stopped the task and reported to the Health Center for assessment. The injury was initially classified as a restricted work event but was reclassified as a lost-time injury on December 7. |
Corrective Action |
Proper ergonomics were utilized, and the worker was not exerting a great level of force to loosen the pipe. No specific point of error was identified. Further investigation to be completed. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | November 9, 2023 |
Incident |
Event Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer |
Details |
A worker was exposed to uranium slurry while performing clean-up tasks in the mill. No radiation work permit was obtained and no post-work samples were collected. The worker subsequently completed tasks in another area of the mill that required a radiation work permit and pre- and post-work testing. Both tests showed elevated results with an initial dose estimate above the weekly action level (greater than 1 mSv). Further analysis is underway. |
Corrective Action |
Cameco placed the worker on enhanced testing with samples being sent for analysis. The worker was assigned to work in a low radiation area until further investigation is completed. Cameco reported the incident to the CNSC. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | October 8, 2023 |
Incident |
Reportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release |
Details |
On October 6, Key Lake workers observed an increase in demand of cooling tower water at a rate of 12.6 m³/hr. However, no signs of a loss in water were detected until October 8, when water was observed flowing from a crack in the pavement within the packaging coverall. As a result, an estimated 605 m3 of treated industrial water was released. |
Corrective Action |
All departments were notified. Site visits were completed, and a course of action determined. Mill Operations shut down to isolate the cooling water line, which is an underground utility. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Date | September 12, 2023 |
Incident |
Radiation Action Level Exceedance |
Details |
A worker performing maintenance in the mill area received a preliminary dose estimate indicative of a weekly action level exceedance. |
Corrective Action |
Confirmatory enhanced urine collection samples were analyzed at both Key Lake and Port Hope Conversation Facility (PHCF) labs and additional monitoring of the worker occurred at PHCF. Action level exceedance has been reported to the CNSC and an investigation is underway. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | September 6, 2023 |
Incident |
Radiation Action Level Exceedance |
Details |
A worker performing maintenance on the primary thickener in the counter current decantation (CCD) mill area received a preliminary dose estimate indicative of a quarterly action level exceedance (estimate of greater than 5 mSv). |
Corrective Action |
Confirmatory enhanced urine collection samples were analyzed at both Key Lake and McArthur River labs. Action level exceedance has been reported to the CNSC and an investigation is underway. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | September 3, 2023 |
Incident |
Reportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release |
Details |
An operator was filling the water wagon at the industrial water fill station near the Mine shop. The operator removed the wheel chocks and started the engine to the water wagon prior to disconnecting the fill hose. The water wagon rolled back slightly, which resulted in damage to the industrial water line located within the feed utilidor. Approximately 1,200 m3 of industrial water was released inside the utilidor (secondary containment). An additional 12 m3 was released outside to the ground near the crusher sump. |
Corrective Action |
The valve for the fill station was closed and the industrial water line was isolated. Environment personnel collected samples. The water wagon was locked out for mechanical inspection. The proper fill procedures and use of wheel chocks were reviewed with site services personnel. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Date | August 16, 2023 |
Incident |
Reportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release |
Details |
After the leak detection alarm was activated, a leaking pipeline within the feed utilidor was discovered. The material was initially released to secondary containment within the feed utilidor. However, approximately 200 kg of uranium ore slurry was released to the ground through a small opening located between the utilidor lids. It was determined the leak was caused by the failure of a victaulic clamp on the pipeline. |
Corrective Action |
A gamma survey was completed. A vacuum truck cleaned up the material released to the ground and transported it to the ore pads. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Date | July 12, 2023 |
Incident |
Event Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer |
Details |
A fire started in the sulphur pit, which is a concrete structure built into the ground within the Key Lake Acid Plant. The Emergency Response Team responded and added 150 lb of dry chemical on the intake side of the pit to smother the fire and drop the temperature within the pit. Water was also added to further drop the temperature. No one was injured in the incident. |
Corrective Action |
The cause of the fire is under investigation and the area is being monitored. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Date | June 27, 2023 |
Incident |
Event Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer |
Details |
While laboratory staff were refilling squirt bottles, nitric acid (1%) was inadvertently mixed with chlorine bleach (10%). This mixture creates chlorine gas. Lab staff immediately alerted their supervisor and evacuated the area. The Emergency Response Team responded to the chemistry lab, performed gas testing and confirmed the area was safe. |
Corrective Action |
The mixture was properly disposed. While the bottles had the proper WHMIS labels, laboratory staff have implemented a visual check by adding color to the exterior of each bottle to further differentiate the chemicals. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | June 6, 2023 |
Incident |
Dangerous Occurrence |
Details |
Workers were tasked with changing a motor on a pump in the secondary containment of the #1 and 2 Leach Pachuca's. The crane was test ran to ensure that it travelled North, South and up and down. While conducting the initial lift of the motor, the workers noticed that one side of the rollers on the Storage Pachua Chain Hoist trolley had shifted and became partially dislodged from the I-Beam. The workers immediately lowered the motor back down onto a secure platform and secured the crane with a chain hoist. There were no injuries as a result of this event. The motor being lifted was 475 pounds and the crane is rated for 1 tonne. The lift area was roped off prior to utilizing the crane, so there were no workers present in the area below. |
Corrective Action |
The incident scene was secured; crane was tagged out and then danger taped off to aid in the investigation of the incident and remove any risk to workers in that area. The OHC committee was convened on June 6, 2023, to investigate the event and ruled the incident a Dangerous Occurrence. Further investigation is currently under way. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | May 31, 2023 |
Incident |
Event Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer |
Details |
In the Mill Facility, an employee fell down the staircase in the yellowcake area, resulting in injuries to their shoulder, knee, elbow, and hand. The emergency response team provided initial assessment and treatment. The employee left on a regularly scheduled flight for an offsite assessment accompanied by an ERT member. It was determined the individual did not sustain any fractures. |
Corrective Action |
There were no issues noted with the staircase handrail and no tripping hazards were observed. Further investigation will be completed. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | April 25, 2023 |
Incident |
Potential Radiation Action Level Exceedance |
Details |
A pinhole leak developed on the line between Continuous Stir Tank Reactors 4 and 6, inside the leaching circuit building. This resulted in leaching process material (slurry) intermittently spraying and potentially misting along the wall and walkway. Five individuals were working in the area and were contacted by the slurry mist. The preliminary dose estimates for two individuals indicated a potential weekly action level exceedance (estimate of greater than 1 mSv). Further analysis is required to confirm the dose calculations. |
Corrective Action |
The area was barricaded and cleaned up. The leak on the pipe was isolated and repairs were completed. Five individuals in the area completed Uranium in Urine sampling to evaluate the possibility for intake. Samples from two workers indicated potential for measurable dose. Enhanced U in U samples for these workers were shipped to Port Hope for analysis and confirmation of the results was received on May 10th. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | April 15, 2023 |
Incident |
Event Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer |
Details |
The emergency response team responded to and extinguished a small amount of saw dust that was observed smoldering in a waste bin outside the maintenance shop. |
Corrective Action |
The event was investigated and the cause is believed to be due to an overheated saw blade. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Date | April 15, 2023 |
Incident |
Emergency Transport to External Medical Facilities / Dangerous Occurrence |
Details |
While working in the Crushing and Grinding building, a worker was struck by a phone booth unit that dislodged from its mounting brackets. The emergency response team was activated to provide medical care and transport to the site health centre. The worker was transported offsite in stable condition via air ambulance for further assessment. |
Corrective Action |
The incident scene was secured and all other similar phone booth structures at the operation have been taped off until further assessment can be completed. The OHC committee was convened to investigate the event. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | January 10, 2023 |
Incident |
Radiation Action Level |
Details |
While performing maintenance on a leaching vessel, two workers had an unplanned radiation exposure that led to exceedances of the quarterly action level of 5 mSv. The total annual dose for both workers remains well below regulatory limits. |
Corrective Action |
The workers were removed from the their tasks to complete the follow-up investigation and dose assessment process. The remaining maintenance work on the leaching vessel was completed in accordance with the applicable procedure without incident. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Date | November 25, 2022 |
Incident |
Reportable Discharge |
Details |
Around 3 a.m., technicians were installing a new helium cylinder in the Chemical Lab gas storage room. When removing the plastic safety cover from the new cylinder outlet valve, the helium began venting. The lab gas storage room was immediately evacuated and sealed off to allow the cylinder to safely vent. The discharge of the helium was approximately 30 minutes in duration, which exceeds the reportable discharge duration of less than 10 minutes. |
Corrective Action |
No entry to the gas storage room was allowed until the air monitoring system indicated it was safe. The cylinder was properly secured at the time of the release. It will be sent back to the manufacturer to investigate if the valve was defective. |
Environmental Effect | 2 |
Date | November 24, 2022 |
Incident |
Regulatory Emission Limit Exceedance |
Details |
The Total Suspended Solids (TSS) regulatory emission limit of 30 mg/L for a grab sample collected from treated water was exceeded for a partial pond released at station 1.4, Bulk Neutralization Effluent discharge. Prior to release, analysis of the pond fill sample returned a TSS value that was acceptable for release. During release, the in-line turbidity monitoring interlock system was activated, halting the discharge. Additional samples were taken and returned results that were acceptable for release. Pond release resumed, however, the turbidity interlock system halted the release a second time, and the remainder of the pond was recycled back to Bulk Neutralization for treatment. The pond release sample was analyzed and returned a value of 37 mg/L, exceeding the regulatory emission limit for a grab sample. Approximately 32% (1307 m3) of the pond was released to the environment and 68% (2788 m3) was recycled. |
Corrective Action |
An additional sample was sent to the SRC Analytical Laboratory for further verification. A sample collected on November 25 from the nearest downstream sample location at Station 4.0 Wolf Lake, indicated normal TSS levels. Further investigation is currently underway. |
Environmental Effect | 2 |
Date | October 28, 2022 |
Incident |
Environmental Action Level Exceedance |
Details |
In accordance with site procedures, a pond of treated effluent was released based on the results of the pond fill composite sample. Results for the pond release composite sample indicated the measured value for uranium (81 µg/L) exceeded the action level of 80 µg/l. Measured results for all parameters, including uranium, were well below the applicable regulatory limits. There was no health or safety risk posed to the public, workers or the environment. |
Corrective Action |
Cameco notified the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, and an investigation has been initiated. |
Environmental Effect | 2 |
Date | October 22, 2022 |
Incident |
Reportable Release |
Details |
A line at Key Lake’s processing facility released water to the ground. It is believed the line was frozen, causing the release. 6 cubic metres of industrial water was released. |
Corrective Action |
Operations lowered the water level in a tank to prevent further overflow to the line. Environment was contacted to collect samples and Site Services used a vacuum truck to clean up the area. The material was disposed of on site. |
Environmental Effect | 2 |
Date | September 20, 2022 |
Incident |
Reportable Release |
Details |
An estimated 2,000 litres of industrial wastewater from the mine shop pump bay sump were released on the ground when the pump testing pit overfilled with potable water. It was determined that when a hose was placed on the hose rack next to the fill valves, the potable water fill valve was bumped into the “on” position, resulting in the sump to fill and overflow. |
Corrective Action |
The supervisor was notified, and the fill valve was shutoff. The event was reported to the environment and site services departments for investigation and cleanup. Federal and provincial regulators were notified. |
Environmental Effect | 2 |
Date | July 13, 2022 |
Incident |
Event Requiring Reporting to the CNSC Duty Officer |
Details |
The incident command centre has been activated in response to a fire southwest of Key Lake. The Key Lake site is not currently under immediate threat. The Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency (SPSA) crews continue to monitor closely. |
Corrective Action |
The SPSA continues to monitor and provide updates to site. The site re-established a fuel break at the VOR station located approximately 10 km southwest of Key Lake, at the direction of the SPSA. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | July 5, 2022 |
Incident |
Radiation Action Level Exceedance |
Details |
Elevated monitoring sample measured for worker post CCD thickener maintenance. Preliminary dose estimate indicated a quarterly action level may have been exceeded. Further analysis was required to confirm dose calculations. |
Corrective Action |
All work was stopped in the area until initial investigation was completed. Workers convened for a JHA to discuss procedure for any work in the CCD thickener going forward. Samples were shipped to an external lab for confirmatory analysis. |
Environmental Effect | N/A |
Date | March 29, 2022 |
Incident |
Reportable release |
Details |
At about 10:15 a.m., during daily inspection, ground water from Well V of the Gaertner dewatering system was observed in a small area outside the well shelter. Release volume is estimated at more than 1000 litres. |
Corrective Action |
The reverse osmosis plant feed was re-routed to an alternate well, isolating Well V from the dewatering system. Water samples were collected and site services conducted cleanup. Further investigation into the incident will be conducted after ground thaws. Provincial and federal regulators were notified. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Date | February 16, 2022 |
Incident |
Reportable release |
Details |
At about 4:00 a.m., a propane leak was detected near the steam plant. |
Corrective Action |
A faulty propane line was isolated and the area secured. Cause of the line failure is under investigation. Provincial and federal regulators were notified. |
Environmental Effect | 1 |
Cameco Environmental Effect Rating
- Level 1 - no measurable impact to the environment
- Level 2 - negligible impact
- Level 3 - short-term, seasonal impact
- Level 4 - mortality of some species, but not affecting ecosystem function
- Level 5 - impairment of ecosystem function
- N/A - not applicable
Decommissioning
Detailed plans and financial guarantees are in place to provide for decommissioning of the McArthur River and Key Lake sites when operations end. Decommissioning will include removal of all buildings and equipment and landscaping and re-vegetation of disturbed areas. All underground workings and other mine and mill facilities will be sealed off and secured. A monitoring program will be in place to ensure the sites remain in a secure and stable state for the long-term.
For more information, see:
Preliminary Decommissioning Plan - Summary - McArthur River Operation
Preliminary Decomissioning Plan - Summary - Key Lake Operation
Environmental Risk Assessment
All new, or substantially changed, mining developments may be subject to environmental risk assessments (ERAs) to identify potential effects on the environment. ERAs follow guidance provided by CSA and various agencies, such as Health Canada (HC), Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC).
In 2020, Cameco completed a detailed quantitative environmental risk assessments (ERA) for its McArthur River and Key Lake Operations to align with the standardized requirements found in CSA N288.6-12 Environmental risk assessment at Class I nuclear facilities and uranium mines and mills (CSA 2012).
Public Summary - Environmental Risk Assessment - McArthur River Operation (PDF 6.7 MB)
Public Summary - Environmental Risk Assessment - Key Lake Operation (PDF 3.8 MB)
Tailings Management
Tailings, or what remains of the ore after the uranium has been removed at the Key Lake mill, is placed in the Deilmann tailings management facility. Commissioned in 1996, the facility is built into the mined out Deilmann pit and is designed to safely contain the tailings during continuing operations and after decommissioning. Tailings are placed in the pit under a water cover. During operations, groundwater is collected from a series of wells around the facility and is treated prior to release to the environment. When operations cease, the tailings will become a solid dense mass and groundwater will flow around the tailings, rather than through them, to minimize environmental impact.
Prior to 1996, tailings from the Key Lake mill were deposited in a surface tailings management facility approximately 600 metres by 600 metres and 15 metres deep. The facility was constructed five metres above the groundwater table and used a modified bentonite liner to isolate the tailings from the surrounding soil.
Regulatory Oversight
The primary regulator for the McArthur River and Key Lake operations is the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC). These operations are also subject to regulatory oversight from several other federal and provincial agencies including Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment. Federal and provincial regulators conduct regular site inspections and audits to verify that people and the environment are protected. Uranium mining and milling operations in Canada are licensed by the CNSC.
Sustainability at Cameco
When measuring the sustainability and ethical impact of a company, environmental, social and governance (ESG) are key factors considered by the public and investors. Sustainability and ESG matters have been an important focus at Cameco for many years and we have a strong performance record.